Model the project
Components, repos, resources, owners, tickets, and integrations become one inspectable project map.
mintbriq turns code, tickets, docs, resources, and ownership into a living project map. When the map no longer matches reality, the drift becomes visible.
Project graph
connected truth
Retry behavior changed
Still describes the old queue
Not recorded
Closed last week
Refund handling changed in code, the runbook still tells support to retry manually, the launch ticket is closed, and the queue owner is missing.
Project risk rarely lives in one place. It appears between a commit, a stale page, a closed ticket, and an owner nobody wrote down.
Webhook retries now move failed refunds into a queue
The refund runbook still tells support to retry manually
The launch ticket is closed with no follow-up task
No team or person is attached to the queue consumer
The workflow is a loop: map what should exist, compare it to what changed, then turn the mismatch into a finding with a clear next action.
Components, repos, resources, owners, tickets, and integrations become one inspectable project map.
mintbriq watches where code, docs, delivery records, and ownership stop agreeing with each other.
Findings explain the mismatch, affected systems, and the evidence that led to the conclusion.
Support follows an old refund runbook after the webhook flow moved refunds into a queue.
A customer import job writes to a table that is not mentioned in the migration plan.
The auth callback changed domains, but the onboarding checklist still sends clients to the old URL.
A payment-provider secret rotates next month and no component owns the renewal task.
A launch ticket is closed while the architecture note still lists the feature as behind a flag.
The incident dashboard tracks an API that was split into two services during the last release.
Start with the systems and resources you already have. mintbriq turns them into an operational model that can be checked.